data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1dd5f/1dd5f52b19834a1777e16c055e5c0a3290b7caec" alt=""
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on behalf of WF, argued that Baltimore lacks constitutional standing to bring the suit. The chain of events linking WF to Baltimore's pain is too long and too weak to confer subject matter jurisdiction on the court.
WF notes that Baltimore caused its own foreclosure problems based on conditions brewing for years. WF's brief notes: "This is an unprecedented lawsuit in which the City seeks to use a single financial services company as a scapegoat for broad social problems that have plagued Baltimore for decades . . . ."
The City of Cleveland has brought a similar suit against 21 investment banks in Cuyahoga County.
No comments:
Post a Comment